Nanded Fata, Pune, Maharashtra 411041
Unitech Research Solutions
+91 7709 372 452 Request Research Proposal
Computational Drug Discovery Workstation
Computational & In-Silico Research Division

Computational Drug Discovery & In-Silico Studies

Protein-ligand molecular docking, virtual screening, pharmacokinetic/ADMET prediction, Network Pharmacology multi-target identification, and pathway enrichment analysis — providing mechanistic in-silico evidence to complement and guide experimental research strategies.

Request In-Silico Study All Services
Docking Engine
AutoDock Vina / HDOCK
ADMET Platform
SwissADME / pkCSM
Network Analysis
Cytoscape / STRING
Pathway Databases
KEGG / GO / Reactome
In-Silico Services

Evidence-Based Computational Research for Drug Discovery

Computational approaches have become an integral component of modern drug discovery, enabling rapid and cost-efficient exploration of molecular interactions, pharmacokinetic behavior, and multi-target therapeutic mechanisms. Our in-silico division provides analysis workflows commonly reported in high-impact pharmacology and medicinal chemistry publications, with transparent methodology and reproducible results using established open-source and commercial platforms.

Molecular Docking Visualization AutoDock Vina Molecular Docking

Computational Study Types

Molecular Docking Studies

Protein-ligand molecular docking using AutoDock Vina (semi-empirical free energy force field) or HDOCK for protein-protein docking. Target protein crystal structures retrieved from RCSB Protein Data Bank (PDB); water molecules removed, polar hydrogens added, Gasteiger charges assigned using AutoDockTools. Ligands prepared in PDBQT format using Open Babel. Grid box defined over active/allosteric site. Best-pose selected based on binding free energy (ΔG, kcal/mol) and key hydrogen bond interactions visualized in BIOVIA Discovery Studio / PyMOL.

AutoDock VinaRCSB PDBH-Bond InteractionΔG Binding EnergyPyMOL Visualization

ADMET & Pharmacokinetic Profiling

In-silico prediction of Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity (ADMET) properties using SwissADME, pkCSM, and ADMET Lab 2.0. Lipinski's Rule of Five (RO5) compliance, Veber's rule for oral bioavailability, blood-brain barrier penetration (log BB), CYP450 enzyme inhibition, AMES mutagenicity, hERG toxicity, and carcinogenicity prediction. Bioavailability radar and BOILED-Egg model plot generated.

SwissADMELipinski RO5Blood-Brain BarrierCYP450AMES Toxicity

Network Pharmacology Analysis

Multi-target multi-pathway analysis integrating: (1) target prediction for bioactive compounds using SwissTargetPrediction, PharmMapper, TargetNet; (2) disease-specific target collection from GeneCards, OMIM, DisGeNET, TTD; (3) common target identification via Venn diagram intersection; (4) protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction using STRING database (confidence score ≥ 0.7) and Cytoscape visualization; (5) hub gene identification by betweenness/degree centrality metrics; (6) GO Biological Process and KEGG pathway enrichment via DAVID / Metascape / g:Profiler.

SwissTargetPredictionGeneCards / OMIMSTRING PPICytoscapeKEGG Enrichment

Molecular Dynamics Simulation (MD)

Short-trajectory (10–50 ns) molecular dynamics simulation of docked protein-ligand complexes using GROMACS with AMBER/CHARMM force fields to assess binding complex stability. Key metrics: RMSD (Root Mean Square Deviation), RMSF (Root Mean Square Fluctuation), radius of gyration (Rg), and hydrogen bond persistence over the simulation trajectory. Used to validate docking results and assess conformational stability of the lead complex.

GROMACSAMBER Force FieldRMSD/RMSF10–50 ns Trajectory

Pharmacophore Modeling & Virtual Screening

3D pharmacophore model generation from known active ligands using LigandScout or Phase (Schrödinger). Features defined: hydrogen bond donors/acceptors, hydrophobic centers, aromatic rings, ionizable groups, and excluded volumes. Virtual screening of chemical libraries (ZINC, PubChem) against pharmacophore model to identify structurally diverse lead candidates for experimental validation.

Pharmacophore ModelingVirtual ScreeningZINC LibraryLead Identification

Standard Computational Workflow

01

Target & Compound Structure Retrieval

Target protein PDB ID selected/retrieved. Compound 2D structures drawn in ChemDraw / Marvin Sketch, energy minimized, and converted to 3D PDBQT/SDF format.

02

Protein Preparation & Active Site Definition

Protein structure prepared (water removal, hydrogen addition, charge assignment). Active site coordinates defined using co-crystallized ligand or binding site residue literature.

03

Docking Execution & Pose Analysis

AutoDock Vina run (exhaustiveness: 8–32). Best pose selected by lowest ΔG. H-bond, hydrophobic, and π-stacking interactions identified using Discovery Studio.

04

ADMET Prediction

SwissADME and pkCSM analysis run for all docked compounds. Lipinski compliance, oral bioavailability, toxicity flags, and CYP interaction assessed.

05

Network Pharmacology & Pathway Analysis

Target prediction, PPI construction, hub gene extraction, and KEGG/GO enrichment analysis completed with bubble/dot plot visualization.

06

Scientific Report & Figure Preparation

Comprehensive report with docking pose images, binding energy tables, ADMET data, network figures (PPI, pathway maps), and interpretive narrative suitable for manuscript submission.

Software & Platforms Used

AutoDock Vina
BIOVIA Discovery Studio
PyMOL Visualizer
SwissADME / pkCSM
Cytoscape (STRING)
GROMACS (MD)
DAVID / Metascape
ChemDraw / MarvinSketch

Frequently Asked Questions

For known natural compounds (quercetin, curcumin, berberine, etc.), structures can be retrieved from PubChem or ChemSpider. For novel or proprietary synthetic compounds, you would need to provide the SMILES notation, InChI string, or a ChemDraw/MDL MOL file. Structures are used solely for the scope of the agreed study and not shared with any third party.
Yes — many journals (including several Scopus-indexed Q2/Q3 journals) publish purely computational or in-silico studies, particularly Network Pharmacology studies, if methodologically sound. However, many high-impact journals require that in-silico findings be accompanied by at least some in-vitro experimental validation. Our team can advise on appropriate target journals for your study design.
Standard studies typically involve 5–20 compounds docked against 1–3 targets, which is the scope commonly reported in published phytochemistry and medicinal chemistry papers. For larger virtual screening campaigns (hundreds to thousands of compounds), a custom computational workflow and timeline will be discussed during the initial consultation.
Note: All computational results are theoretical predictions based on currently available crystal structures, force fields, and target prediction databases. In-silico binding affinities and ADMET predictions do not constitute experimental validation of biological activity, pharmacokinetic behavior, or clinical safety. Experimental verification is essential before any scientific conclusion is drawn from computational data alone.

In-Silico Study Inquiry

Discuss your computational research needs

Explore In-Silico Possibilities

Our computational team can help design the right in-silico study for your research.

Contact Us WhatsApp Us